NoodleFoodlers (E-mail) | Recent Comments
NoodleCaboodle (Info) | Archives | Blogroll
RSS Feed (Via E-mail) | OList.com
Coalition for Secular Government | FIRM
  A daily dose of philosophical food for your noodle! 

Wednesday, July 16, 2008


GOP Platform Website
By Paul Hsieh @ 12:26 AM PermaLink

The Republican Party is apparently requesting voter input on the GOP Platform 2008 website.

Over the past few months, I have told several local non-religious Republicans that I can't support the party, including one of the delegates to the state convention. He runs a small coffee cart in the building where I work and is a prototypical hard-working small businessman. He is also frustrated by the dominance of the religious conservatives in the party, so I told him where I stood in hopes that it would give him some moral support to more forcefully advocate his own views at the Party convention.

Local writer Ari Armstrong has noted that the Colorado Republicans know that they are being hurt badly by their support of religious causes. It may not make a perceivable difference in 2008, but I think it's important for them to know that there is a group of voters whom they are alienating precisely because the party is mixing religion and politics. If the Republicans think that courting the religionists has only an upside without a downside, then they'll keep doing it. But if they start recognizing that there is a downside, then it might spark more badly-needed internal discussion.

Hence, I decided to log on to the GOP Platform site and leave comments under the sections for "Abortion", "Religious Liberty", "Same Sex Marriage", and "Other" including a couple of links to Ayn Rand's essays on government and rights from the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights website.

I don't expect any specific or immediate response from them. But as usual, you never know when the right idea might reach the right mind. Here are a couple of represenative comments:
The Republican Party must promote the strict separation of church and state. I used to support the Republican Party because I believe in individual rights, free markets, a strong national defense, and the right to keep and bear arms.

However, the Republican Party alliance with the religious right on "social issues" like stem cell research, abortion and gay marriage has turned off many former supporters such as myself.

Americans have a right to practice their religion as a purely private matter, and I defend everyone's right to do so.

But the government should not force one group's religious views on everyone. Hence, I no longer have a home in any political party. To paraphrase a quote from Ronald Reagan, "I didn't leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me."

(This should not be taken as any kind of endorsement of Barack Obama - I find his policies loathsome and anti-American.)

Paul Hsieh, MD
Sedalia, CO
And
The Republican Party must promote the strict separation of church and state. I used to support the Republican Party because I believe in individual rights, free markets, a strong national defense, and the right to keep and bear arms.

However, the Republican Party alliance with the religious right on "social issues" like abortion and gay marriage has turned off many former supporters such as myself.

The proper function of the government is to protect individual rights, as philosopher Ayn Rand notes:

"Man's Rights"
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=arc_ayn_rand_man_rights

"The Nature of Government"
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=arc_ayn_rand_the_nature_of_government

The government should not force one group's religious views on everyone. Hence, I no longer have a home in any political party. To paraphrase a quote from Ronald Reagan, "I didn't leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me."

Labels: ,

  E-mail Paul Hsieh    PermaLink ()    Comments (New Page)    

Comments on "GOP Platform Website"
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 at 3:34:56 mst
Comment ID: #1
Name: Burgess Laughlin
E-mail: burgesslaughlin(at)macforcego.com
URL: http://www.aristotleadventure.blogspot.com

>"If the Republicans think that courting the religionists has only an upside without a downside, then they'll keep doing it."

If the people who control a political party are "pragmatists," that is, lacking any ideology, then appealing to their fear of failure (loss of power) might change their course. But, if the leaders of a party have consistently integrated religious principles into their lives, then they might not care whether they lose. Better to lose an election than to lose one's soul. And that is the right position to take for anyone who acts on principle.

The question I can't answer is this: Who _does_ control the Republican Party? What is their ideology, if any? Or is the Party a sort of grand social compromise not dominated by any particular ideology or worldview?


Wednesday, July 16, 2008 at 12:48:18 mst
Comment ID: #2
Name: rrlv_frsh

From Paul's post:

----------
The government should not force one group's religious views on everyone. Hence, I no longer have a home in any political party. To paraphrase a quote from Ronald Reagan, "I didn't leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me."
----------

Paul: Sorry, but I don't quite follow your reference to Ronald Reagan. Was he actually talking about the Democrat Party in his original statement? Did you intend to convey to readers that you agree with and support his views? Most readers probably think of Reagan as the archetype Mr. Republican. Few general readers probably know that Ayn Rand was very strongly opposed to Reagan's candidacy because of his stand on abortion, and because he did more than any other candidate in recent history to bring religion into politics and into the Republican Party. Shouldn't a general reader be alerted (perhaps with just a few well placed added adjectives) that Reagan represents exactly what you most oppose?


Wednesday, July 16, 2008 at 13:01:33 mst
Comment ID: #3
Name: Paul Hsieh
E-mail: paul(at)geekpress(dot)com
URL: http://www,geekpress.com

To rrlv_frsh:

Yes, I was referring to Reagan's classic quote, although as you correctly noted he was describing how the Democratic party left him. Hence my use of the word "paraphrase". Given that my primary audience was a group of Republican Party officials, I figured I'd phrase my position in terms they should all be familiar with.

Since I was trying to convey a general point about driving away supporters, I didn't think it was necessary put in a disclaimer that I wasn't actually endorsing Reagan, but only that they were doing to me what the Democrats did to a younger Reagan -- namely drive me away.


Sunday, October 26, 2008 at 13:20:04 mst
Comment ID: #4
Name: Lex Louis
E-mail: lewvcps(at)aol.com

Quite Right. Some will remember that John McCain was betrayed buy the NYS Republican Party in 2000 because, back then he had the moxy to stand up to the religious right. Reagan and Bush II have made the Republican party and Christian conservatism so analagious that many who might ortherwise support their candidates stances on fiscal and many social issues feel they cannot because of this alliance.


Post Your Comment on "GOP Platform Website"

Name or Handle:
E-mail:
URL:
 Remember Me
 
Comment:  
No HTML is allowed. URLs will be automatically converted into clickable links.

Commenters are welcome to clearly state their own views, as well as to criticize opposing views and arguments. Unjust personal attacks are not welcome.

The NoodleFood comments are not a general discussion board. Do not post random questions or comments, except on the designated "open threads" posted on Wednesdays and Sundays.

To weed out spammers: 5 plus 4 equals 4878308149103550133