A daily dose of philosophical food for your noodle!
NoodleFood : RSS Feed | via E-mail | Recent Comments | Archives
NoodleCast : M4A via iTunes (MP3) | via Feed Reader | via E-mail
Diana Hsieh : Rationally Selfish | PhiloFiles | Explore Atlas Shrugged
OList Mailing Lists | FIRM | FRO | Secular Government

 Saturday, January 03, 2009

Health Link-O-Rama

By Diana Hsieh @ 11:13 AM

  • Butter, Margarine and Heart Disease: Stephan compares butter and margarine consumption with rates of heart disease mortality for the last 100 years.

    If I recall correctly, my family switched to margarine for a few years in the late 1980s, then we returned to butter after some news about problems with margarine. After that, I was skeptical that butter is terribly damaging, but I tried to use it in moderation. I certainly wasn't willing to endure the nasty fake taste of any of the supposedly healthier alternatives! However, now I'm lavish with butter, particularly with my vitamin-rich homemade raw milk butter. Life is so much better with lots of butter!

  • Epidemic Influenza and Vitamin D: Wow, could widespread Vitamin D deficiency cause our winter susceptibility to influenza? Free the Animal thinks so -- and for good reason. He links to and quotes from this fascinating report from a physician; it's the backstory of an academic paper. I very strongly recommend it. Also, FTA's earlier post on Vitamin D and pregnancy is well worth reading.

  • Regarding Vitamin D, the ever-useful Heart Scan Doc alerts us to a new $65 Vitamin D home test available from ZRT Laboratory and the Vitamin D Council. He also has a great post on the required doses of Vitamin D. He writes:
    Though needs vary widely, the majority of men require 6000 units per day, women 5000 units per day. Only then do most men and women achieve what I'd define as desirable: 60-70 ng/ml 25-hydroxy vitamin D blood level.

    I base this target level by extrapolating from several simple observations:

    --In epidemiologic studies, a blood level of 52 ng/ml seems to be an eerily consistent value: >52 ng/ml and cancer of the colon, breast, and prostate become far less common; <52 ng/ml and cancers are far more likely. I don't know about you, but I'd like to have a little larger margin of safety than just achieving 52.1 ng/ml.

    --Young people (not older people >40 years old, who have lost most of the capacity to activate vitamin D in the skin) who obtain several days to weeks of tropical sun typically have 25-hydroxy vitamin D blood levels of 80-100 ng/ml without adverse effect.

    More recently, having achieved this target blood level in many people, I can tell you confidently that achieving this blood level of vitamin D achieves:

    --Virtual elimination of "winter blues" and seasonal affective disorder in the great majority
    --Dramatic increases in HDL cholesterol (though full effect can require a year to develop)
    --Reduction in triglycerides
    --Modest reduction in blood pressure
    --Dramatic reduction in c-reactive protein (far greater than achieved with Crestor, JUPITER trial or no)
    --Increased bone density (improved osteoporosis/osteopenia)
    --Halting or reversal of aortic valve disease
    Wow. As soon as I can reasonably manage, I'll have Paul's and my Vitamin D levels tested. I'll report back the results, of course!

    Labels: ,

    Share |
  •    E-mail Diana Hsieh     PermaLink ()    Comments (New Page)

      Subscribe to NoodleFood Blog Posts via Feed Reader   via E-mail
    Subscribe to NoodleCast Podcasts M4A via iTunes (MP3)   via Feed Reader   via E-mail

     Comments

    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 13:22:25 mst
    Comment ID: #1
    Name: Chris W

    I don't (yet) understand the need for Vit D testing. As far as I understand things at this point, it's quite difficult to achieve toxic doses of D, and the dose you'll get just by being out in the sun could easily dwarf what you'd get in a 5000 IU pill (1250% of RDA!).

    So my strategy at the moment is to episodically (not every day, and not when I expect to be outdoors a lot) supplement with 5000 IU, and sometimes with 1000 IU.

    I subscribe to Dr De Vany's thesis that chronic supplementation of any kind is probably a bad idea, since there may be a crowding out effect as different nutrients compete for metabolic resources, and relatively little is presently known about optimal nutrition, and its various tradeoffs,.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 13:38:52 mst
    Comment ID: #2
    Name: Diana Hsieh
    E-mail: diana(at)dianahsieh.com
    URL: http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog

    Chris -- From what I've read, some people can spend lots of time out in the sun, yet be deficient in Vitamin D. So in another post, Dr. Davis writes: "[Vitamin D] is the only hormone that is meant to be activated by sun exposure of the skin, not obtained through diet. But the ability to activate D is lost by the majority of us by age 40 and even a dark tan is no assurance that sufficient skin prohormone D activation has taken place."

    More generally, the problem is that you can't tell just based on your sun exposure or supplemented D whether you're deficient or not. You have to do the blood test. (In other words, people's D values are too individual to give anything other than very loose recommendations absent a blood test.)

    See:

    http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-much-vitamin-d-should ...

    And: http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-basic-vitamin-d-issu ...

    Plus, lots of people don't get adequate sun -- particularly in the winter up north -- if they work regular jobs. So supplements might be their best option.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 14:13:58 mst
    Comment ID: #3
    Name: Chris W

    I see the point, and it might be a good idea to have a blood test to get an indication of where things stand. To account for the impact of sun exposure one should probably test once in the winter, and once in the summer to see what range one falls within given the skin's inherent ability to activate D.

    In any case, I'm sceptical towards spending much time/money/brain-power trying to narrowly manage specific nutrients given the uncertainties involved. Rather than filling my fridge with all sorts of supplements and blood testing for each, I think that I get the most bang for the buck by restricting carbs, eating healthy fats, meats, a variety of non starchy veggies...well, you already know the drill!

    Perhaps guarding against Vit D deficiency is a special case that should be of extra concern. I'm not entirely convinced yet (having seen one vitamin after the other become hyped over the years), but evidence seems to be piling up.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 14:57:03 mst
    Comment ID: #4
    Name: Richard Nikoley
    E-mail: rnikoley(at)gmail.com
    URL: http://www.freetheanimal.com

    Chris:

    You might find these epidemiological summaries I put up the other day interesting (I provide links to the full presentations which are quite extensive).

    Vitamin D Deficiency and Type 1 Diabetes
    http://www.freetheanimal.com/root/2008/12/vitamin-d-deficiency-and- ...

    Melanoma, Sun, and Its Synthetic Defeat (Sunscreen)
    http://www.freetheanimal.com/root/2008/12/melanoma-sun-and-its-synt ...

    Vitamin D Deficiency and All Cancer
    http://www.freetheanimal.com/root/2008/12/vitamin-d-deficiency-and- ...

    Thanks for the shout, Diana. I just compiled the numbers and Noodle Food was number five for referrals to Free the Animal for December.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 17:22:22 mst
    Comment ID: #5
    Name: Chris W

    Thank you Richard and Diana,

    Since I have already begun taking 5000 IU as of Jan 1st, I'm going to order the blood test from ZRT Laboratory to check what my levels are after a couple of weeks of supplementation. It can't hurt to know, and I'm Scandinavian, live in front of a computer, and have cancer in the family.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 19:16:32 mst
    Comment ID: #6
    Name: Ashley
    E-mail: atking(at)mtaonline.net

    Thanks for the health links. I live in Alaska and we often have clouds and ice fog in the winter. In fact, Fairbanks is going to -55 F tonight (we're only -20F). I am going to try increasing my D intake from 400 IU to 5000 IU. If getting rid of the winter blues is this easy I will be very pleased.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 22:44:42 mst
    Comment ID: #7
    Name: Jim May
    E-mail: seerak(at)gmail.com

    As heart disease and diabetes go hand in hand in *my* history, I'll be picking up that test also -- thanks for the tip Diana!


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 23:00:16 mst
    Comment ID: #8
    Name: Jim May
    E-mail: seerak(at)gmail.com

    Hey Diana, what is the consistency of your homemade raw butter, when it's straight out of the fridge? I'm curious to compare it to the raw butter I can buy at Whole Foods.


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 23:20:01 mst
    Comment ID: #9
    Name: Chris W

    I just discovered that I can't order the kit to NYC, which is where I live:

    "New York State health law prohibits the testing of specimens collected in or mailed from New York and prohibits the transmission of data from our laboratory to NY physicians or residents. Therefore, we are unable to process such orders at this time."

    So here I bump into another instance of the absurd evil of socialized medicine. (I won't broadcast here what I think should be done to the subhumans who wrote this law.)


    Saturday, January 3, 2009 at 23:21:13 mst
    Comment ID: #10
    Name: Diana Hsieh
    E-mail: diana(at)dianahsieh.com
    URL: http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog

    My homemade butter seems pretty much like regular butter in consistency. The only major difference is taste and color. (It's yellow, due to its vitamins. And it tastes more like butter.) I've not had store-bought raw butter, so I don't have any basis for comparison to that.


    Sunday, January 4, 2009 at 1:32:28 mst
    Comment ID: #11
    Name: Jim May
    E-mail: seerak(at)gmail.com

    The store-bought butter is almost crumbly, at least the last batch we had was like that. I'll be picking up some more tomorrow, so I'll see if that was an oddball perhaps.

    Cris W: yup, same thing here in California. I might just go ahead and supplement to 6000 IU based on the info in posts Diana linked, until I can find an MD who's willing to think outside the government box. That, and begin my cod-liver and butter oil experiment.

    Speaking of which, I ran across an interesting tidbit of information on Friday; researchers have developed a nanotechnological coating for teeth that seems to make the tooth enamel too *slippery* for bacteria to stick to it. This sounds like the observed effect of the oil supplements. I wonder if that's what they do -- interfere with the bacterial adhesion necessary to form biofilm (plaque)?


    Monday, January 5, 2009 at 9:17:34 mst
    Comment ID: #12
    Name: KPO'M
    E-mail: ka84796(at)comcast.net

    Steve Jobs has come forth with some additional information about his health:

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6a1e37a6-db34-11dd-be53-000077b07658.html

    I'm curious as to whether that vegan diet is contributing at all, although perhaps it's a residual effect of the pancreatic cancern or treatment.


     Post Your Comment

    Name or Handle:
    E-mail:
    URL:
     Remember Me
     
    Comment:  
    No HTML is allowed. URLs will be automatically converted into clickable links.

    Commenters are welcome to clearly state their own views, as well as to criticize opposing views and arguments. Unjust personal attacks are not welcome.

    The NoodleFood comments are not a general discussion board. Do not post random questions or comments, except on the designated "open threads" posted on Wednesdays and Sundays.

    To weed out spammers: 9 plus 5 equals 7967080541159605671