Oh, and a sick Jacob Levy complains about grumpiness:
Which reminds me: did you see this article about curmudgeons in the Sunday NYT? It has the unmitigated gall to compare Andy Rooney and Art Buchwald-- Art Buchwald!-- to, say, H.L. Mencken and George Carlin. Rooney is termed "curmudgeon in chief."
Mencken: took on the politics and culture of an era. Rooney: complains about the consistency of his earwax.
Carlin: went to the Supreme Court to defend freedom of speech. Buchwald: Dethawed every week to continue writing Maureen Dowd columns without the sex jokes.
In other words: I'm grumpy about the state of media coverage of grumpiness, and about the decline in the quality of grumpiness.
Did I mention I'm sick today?
I've been struggling through a series of deadlines for the entire month of May, so I've been unusually grumpy lately -- particularly in my online communications. (Then again, I haven't been able to leave the house much, so online communications have really been my only communications with people other than Paul.) Well, tonight I should be done with the last May deadline... and then I head down to Taos, New Mexico for a few days of very-very-very-much-vacation with my parents who are RV'ing around the southwest. I desperately hope that I'll be able to set aside some time to ride my horses and garden a bit when I return.
Your probability coefficient: 1.95839045518104E-08.
You have to meet 51,062,340 American single males who are between 27 and 45 years old.
You might have to move.
Uh, yeah, if you're dating by random sample... maybe. I was pretty generous with my criteria... And stupidly, none of the criteria concerned sex drive, which strikes me as quite important in any long-term relationship. (Via Spy in the House of Bling.)
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
BlogRoll Update By Diana Hsieh @ 1:15 PM
I've finally updated the blogroll... it was hastily done, but at least it reflects my reading habits better than the long-outdated old blogroll.
Well, Blogger doesn't seem to be accepting the changes to the template. *@^#()!&* Thrill. Well, I'll just past them below until Blogger decides to behave like good software.
Despite the moniker, the super-DMCA bills are not much like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which became federal law in 1998. They do deal with the same issue--the protection of copyright in an age when digital devices make piracy an easy task--but the state bills use much broader language. (The state bills differ in their details, but are all based on the same model legislation.) They outlaw any "communications device" used "without the express consent or express authorization of the communication service provider." That means your phone company, cable company, and ISP get to decide what's legal and what's not. This is not a good idea for the future of tech competition.
...
The problem of protecting copyrights is a real one, and it is difficult to solve. But the super-DMCA bills, in their attempt to counter vague threats with vague language, create more problems than they solve. Theft, fraud, and copyright violation are already illegal. Making every “communications device” suspect and every consumer a possible criminal is not the way to prevent piracy.
Thankfully, Colorado's governor Bill Owens, who recently vetoed one of these stupid super-DCMA laws, seems to agree with Hanah. According to Linda Seebach of the Rocky Mountain News (via Instapundit), Bill Owens warned the legislature "to be more careful in drafting a bill that adds protections that are rightfully needed, but does not paint a broad brush stroke where only a tight line is needed."
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
But just as politicians and religious leaders appeal to our narcissistic tendencies and our fears of being rejected by the herd, so Rand takes advantage of these weaknesses. In most of her works, she glorifies the human mind and tells the reader that he or she possess the magnificent power of reason, and that no-one is his or her intellectual superior. She uses the word "social mystic" to describe any person that believes in the existence of people with intelligence superior to one's own intelligence. This makes the reader feel excellent and worthy of existence. Those who read Rand's works often go to meetings called "objectivist workshops" where they are told what all of the correct opinions are on every political, ethical and philosophical issue. Once the person attending these meetings demonstrates that all of the correct opinions have been formed, membership to the "objectivist club" is offered. Strangely, thousands of people have been excommunicated from this club for erring ever so slightly in the formation of any particular opinion. It is difficult to understand how one can reconcile the desire to avoid being a "social mystic" with the requirement to form an official set of opinions. [Emphasis added.]
I don't think there's a single true claim in that whole paragraph. (I didn't bother to read the rest of the post. This bit was quite enough for me!)
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
Interesting Changes at TOC By Diana Hsieh @ 3:16 PM
The much-hailed George de Feis has parted company with The Objectivist Center -- after only six months as chief operating officer. According to the announcement Paul and I (and other sponors) received, the staff reductions due to budget constraints this year "reduced the need for a fulltime manager at his level." More interestingly, the announcement notes that "it had also become clear that his particular skills and experience were not the best fit for our mission." I wonder what that means... and whether it has anything to do with the allegations that he seriously mismanaged the US Chess Federation as its executive director.
TOC seems lost to me these days. From my (admittedly very much outside) perspective, they don't seem to be doing much except Navigator and the Summer Seminar. And that's just not enough.
More Done! By Diana Hsieh @ 1:01 AM
Whew! The abstract and outline of my six-lecture "Objectivism 101" course for TOC's summer seminar is done too! Given that I only just started revising these lectures, some of it is likely to be not-entirely-accurate by the time the seminar rolls around. But since the outline covers six hours of lecturing, it's pretty short on detail anyway.
Objectivism 101 Abstract
Ayn Rand's novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged offer a unique and inspiring moral vision, but translating those ideals into daily life can be a challenge. In these lectures, we will survey the basic principles of Objectivism, from metaphysics to aesthetics. We will focus on both the theory and practice of the philosophy, contrasting it with common religious and cultural views. Although no familiarity with the philosophy of Objectivism is presumed for this course, acquaintance with Ayn Rand's two major novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged will be helpful. Each session will draw upon ideas and themes from the earlier lectures, so attendance of all the lectures is recommended.
Objectivism 101 Outline
I. Ayn Rand and Philosophy
Ayn Rand's life and work
Philosophy
The questions of philosophy
Philosophy as universal, inescapable, and influential
Philosophy in everyday life
Objectivism in brief
II. Reality and Reason
Metaphysics
Primacy of existence
Primacy of consciousness
Epistemology
Perceptual and conceptual awareness
Reason
The data of the senses
The method of logic
The effort of volition
Emotions
God and the supernatural
III. Life and Happiness
Ethics
The ethics of Western culture
Why do we need ethics?
Life and happiness
Rational self-interest
Moral principles
Values and virtues
Social ethics
Sacrifice of self or others
The Trader Principle
Individualism
Mind-body integration
IV. The Virtues
Virtue
Rationality
Productiveness
Independence
Honesty
Justice
Benevolence
Integrity
Pride
The self-made soul
V. Individual Rights and Capitalism
Politics
Individual rights
Negative (and not positive) rights
Coercion
Government
Economics
Economic systems
Capitalism
The critiques of capitalism
Defending capitalism
VI. Art as Spiritual Fuel
Aesthetics
Art as spiritual fuel
Art and philosophy
Sense of life
Standards in art
Objectivism
Objectivism as a system
Studying Objectivism
The future of Objectivism
For those of you who have no idea what that means, last summer I took on the task of developing the curriculum for Camp Indecon's 17 year olds. (The camp was expanded to include that age group this year.) I'll also be teaching my curriculum at camp this summer.
As a bit of background, Camp Indecon is a week-long summer camp (held from July 19th to July 26th in Woodland Park, Colorado) that teaches kids practical, rational philosophy and life skills using the Montessori method. Here's what the web site says about its philosophy:
If we don't formally teach our children how to think, society will teach them not to.
The staff of Camp Indecon has created a curriculum to formally teach children how to think for themselves and be responsible for their decisions based on their nature as human beings.
Our campers learn the skills of independent thinking through the Montessori Method of Education, which stresses following life's natural path of development and maintains that (i) anything presented to a child should meet his/her developmental needs at the time, (ii) each child's own pace and style of learning should be followed, and (iii) the child should be free to choose his/her own work within the limits and structure of the program.
Montessori's emphasis is the child's preparation for life, not just the exam. By considering the whole child's development and individual interests and personality, it fosters independence, self-direction, self-discipline and self-motivation while providing superior preparation in academic areas.
For our campers, increased self-confidence is the natural outcome of recognizing that they are capable of creating their own life plans. Through hands-on activities, they learn about the nature of the world, especially their own nature as human beings. Through working examples, they discover the consequences of listening to peers with incorrect thinking habits and witness the positive results of healthy ones.
I was only able to attend Camp Indecon for two days last summer, but I got to witness each of the sections (9-10, 11-12, 13-14, and 15-16 year olds) in at least one of their two daily hour-long lessons. There's not much that's cooler than watching 9 and 10 year olds understanding what a self-fulfilling prophecy is, 11 and 12 year olds learning why its important to have a plan in life, 13 and 14 year olds constructing an ideal society, and 15 and 16 year olds struggling to develop definitions and learning about logical fallacies.
My lessons for the 17 year olds are:
Speak Your Mind: The basic skills of public speaking.
We're All Philosophers: The nature and importance of philosophy to everyday life.
Two Methods: How to effectively use the methods of evaluation and integration to judge ideas.
Uncommon Sense: The ways in which glittering generalities and confirmation bias distort our reasoning.
Influence I: The ways in which the principles of reciprocation, consistency, and social proof can influence our actions.
Influence II: The ways in which the principles of liking, authority, and scarcity can influence our actions.
Mining Philosophy: The various sources of philosophical ideas, including culture, art, and religion.
Motivating Action: The practical differences between a duty-driven and goal-directed approach to life.
Guiding Action: The role of rules and principles in everyday decisions.
Second Nature Virtue: The importance of making virtue second nature through moral habits.
Defining Your Politics: Using The World's Smallest Political Quiz to define (and then defend) political views.
There's also a lesson on money management... rightfully taught by a professional rather than a philosopher!
The Perfunctory Post About the Atlas Movie By Diana Hsieh @ 8:53 AM
Many fans of Rand are thrilled at the prospect of an movie of Atlas Shrugged. Frankly, I've heard such announcements so often (about both Atlas and The Fountainhead) over the past ten years that it's hard to get excited. But Ari Armstrong gives us actual reason to worry in this post to OWL:
"The Objectivist Center is pleased to announce that a new project to film Atlas Shrugged has just been launched [by] Crusader Entertainment... The company also announced that it has signed veteran screenwriter James V. Hart, whose film credits include the ambitious adaptation of Carl Sagan's science fiction novel Contact, to write the screenplay... James V. Hart's writing/producing credits include: Hook, directed by Steven Spielberg; Bram Stocker's Dracula, directed by Francis Ford Coppola; Contact, directed by Robert Zemeckis; Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, directed by Kenneth Branagh as producer with Coppola and John Veitch; Jack and The Beanstalk: The Real Story, directed by Brian Henson, a Jim Henson/CBS mini-series; and Tuck Everlasting, directed by Jay Russell for Disney."
Hart managed to turn a great pro-reason, pro-science book by Sagan into an apology of faith. (See my earlier review.) Contact is a good movie because it is based on a good book, because Zemeckis has a lot of talent, and because the cast does a good job. Hart, though, turned the theme on its head.
Obviously, ideas are all-important in Atlas Shrugged, and I fear Hart will similarly screw it up.
The rest of Hart's resume does little to ease my anxiety. Hook and Dracula were fun but intellectually vacuous. And Frankenstein, shall we say, was an apt title for that particular movie.
The mere fact that Hart ended up as the screenwriter indicates to me the studio lacks either an understanding of the subject material or money (or perhaps both). I will breath a sigh of relief when, once again, an announced filming of Atlas Shrugged falls through.
-Ari Armstrong
Given the emegence of big screen miniseries with Lord of the Rings and The Matrix (as opposed to self-contained sequels), I do wonder whether either Atlas Shugged or The Fountainhead could be made into say, a two or three movie movie. That would be cool.
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
I was happy. My girlfriend and I were dating for over a year, and so we decided to get married. My parents helped us in every way; my friends encouraged me, and my girlfriend? She was a dream! There was only one thing bothering me, quite much indeed, and that was my mother-in-law to be.
She was a career woman, smart, but most of all beautiful and sexy, who sometimes flirted with me, which made me feel uncomfortable. One day she called me and asked me to come over to check the wedding invitations. So I went. She was alone, and when I arrived, she whispered to me, that soon I was to be married, and she had feelings and desires for me that she couldn't overcome. So before I got married and committed my life to her daughter, she wanted to make love to me just once. What could I say? I was in total shock, and couldn't say a word.
So, she said, "I'll go to the bedroom, and if you are up for it, just come and get me." I just watched her delicious behind as she went up the stairs. I stood there for a moment, and then turned around and went to the front door... I opened it, and stepped out of the house.
Her husband was standing outside and with tears in his eyes, hugged me and said, "We are very happy and pleased, you have passed our little test. We couldn't have asked for a better man for our daughter. Welcome to the family."
Post-Vacation Blues By Diana Hsieh @ 10:40 AM
Over the past year, I've managed to dramatically increase my productivity, largely with the help of a simple weekly time management system in excel. (You can see a sample sheet of a single, typical week in excel. Tuesdays and Thursdays only required two hours of work because I was in school most of the day. Readings for class aren't counted as work in the system, but papers are.) As a result of targeting and tracking my time in various projects, I've managed to get so much more done this year than last.
But I still have a lingering problem, one that was particularly evident (and particularly painful) this week. I hope that others might have some suggestions for how to resolve it. The problem is that once I stop work for a much-needed few days of vacation, returning to work is a painfully difficult process of days and days. I simply can't manage to concentrate on work again; it feels physically impossible. This time around, it was a slow and painful process, despite a fast-approaching deadline for my Camp Indecon lessons. Yesterday, I did finally manage to get some work done, but it was too little too late. (This is not a problem unique to philosophizing, as I remember having the same post-vacation difficulties while working as a programmer.)
I agree with some of criticisms of Stephen Hunter's (spoiler-heavy) review of The Matrix Reloaded. The politics of Zion, for example, really weren't all that captivating. And we're definitely stopped in the middle of a larger movie, which is frustrating. But his argument that the second movie lost touch with the first's themes of "What is real? I am in control of my own life?" is just plain wrong. He writes:
Perhaps the most serious deficiency of "Reloaded" is conceptual. Possibly it couldn't be helped. But at the core, the idea of what the Matrix meant -- and it was that idea that drove the film to astonishing success and influence -- isn't truly reestablished here. I suppose the Wachowskis take it for granted and assume that we do as well, but that's dangerous. It was so useful an idea, so resonant, an equal-opportunity delusion for the secret paranoids that all of us really are: that a secret screen of anti-reality had been imposed by a cabal of mechanical monsters to hide the elemental truth. We're zombies, they drain our electricity, what we see is simply neural responses to pricks inside our brains.
Au contraire! Neo's discovery of the true purpose of The One folds those same themes back on themselves. He and Morpheus and everyone else thought that unplugging from the Matrix left them securely in the Real World. They thought Zion was free and independent. But all is still merely an elaborate deception of the Matrix designed to maintain the dominance of the machines -- but not in the obvious brain-in-a-vat way. And significantly, that plot twist resolves some of the deeply unsatisfactory ideas of the first movie, including fatalism and irrelevance of choice, the puzzle about source of Neo's One-ness, and so on. The original themes of The Matrix are more subtle and twisted in Reloaded, but certainly very much still in force.
I won't say more, as I don't want to get into the details... go see the movie!
The Matrix Reloaded By Diana Hsieh @ 1:23 AM
Paul and I just returned from our late viewing of The Matrix Reloaded. A few quick thoughts: The fight scenes were wowowowow awesome. The relationship between Neo and Trinity was well-fleshed-out (*ahem*). Zion is not exactly a holy Christian or Moslem or Jewish enclave. The plot twists were completely unexpected, but nevertheless sensible in retrospect. The mystical bizarreness of the first movie was resolved. Many unanswered questions linger for the third movie.
Not Always So Boring By Diana Hsieh @ 3:44 PM
Neil Cavuto is Fox News' calm and straight-laced VP of business news and host of "Your World." But he's not as nice and boring as he looks. Today's Righteous Fisking of Paul Krugman, for example, was pure delight. I'll quote the whole thing, as a slice is just inadequate.
Since no good deed goes unpunished, leave it to The New York Times to take a shot at me. Not The Times itself, but columnist Paul Krugman, who blasts me for my apparent blatant partisanship.
He writes:
"Neil Cavuto of Fox News is an anchor, not a commentator. Yet after Baghdad's fall he told 'those who opposed the liberation of Iraq' -- a large minority -- that 'you were sickening then; you are sickening now.'"
First off, Mr. Krugman, let me correct you: I'm a host and a commentator, just like you no doubt call yourself a journalist and a columnist. So my sharing my opinions is a bad thing, but you spouting off yours is not?
Exactly who's the hypocrite, Mr. Krugman? Me, for expressing my views in a designated segment at the end of the show? Or you, for not so cleverly masking your own biases against the war in a cheaply written column?
You're as phony as you are unprofessional. And you have the nerve to criticize me, or Fox News, and by extension, News Corporation?
Look, I'd much rather put my cards on the table and let people know where I stand in a clear editorial, than insidiously imply it in what's supposed to be a straight news story. And by the way, you sanctimonious twit, no one -- no one -- tells me what to say. I say it. And I write it. And no one lectures me on it. Save you, you pretentious charlatan.
Let me see if I have this right, Mr. Krugman. Journalists who opposed this war are OK. Those who support it are not. Says who? You?
I'm less of a journalist because I was in favor of this war, but you're more of a journalist because you were not? You imply that by being in favor of this war, I'm pandering, and by extension, my company is pandering to the White House.
Nowhere does it ever occur to you, one can legitimately not agree with you. That doesn't make me less of a journalist. But, Mr. Krugman, it does make you more of an ass. Here's the difference: You insinuated it, I just said it.
Now may I suggest you take your column and shove it?
Andrew Sullivan characterizes Cavuto as responding "somewhat intemperately." That's an understatement. But Krugman deserved every bit of Cavuto's intemperate response. Oh, and Matthew Hoy has a nice dissection of the stupidity of the rest of Krugman's column. (According to Hoy, the version of Cavuto's comments reprinted on Fox News' site isn't word-for-word perfect. Perhaps I'll TiVO the later airing, as Paul and I are -- of course -- off to see The Matrix: Reloaded this evening.)
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
...while I'm not an expert on the psychological research surrounding this subject, my sense is that it's not inherently that hard for people to find role models who differ from them in race or sex. People are capable of being inspired by people who lived centuries before them, who spoke a completely different language, had a completely different ethnicity, and lived a completely different sort of life. Ask an American classical musician, for instance, which figures in history he has admired -- is he likelier to mention American or English composers, or German or Russian ones? People are capable of abstracting those factors (which in any event shouldn't be the basis for admiration), and focusing on more important matters, such as the person's great achievements or great character (which should be the basis for admiration). I suspect that people are likewise able to abstract race and sex as well.
But while I think people are inherently able to choose role models from either gender and any race, ethnicity, religion, and era, social attitudes can change that. The more we talk about how girls need female role models, blacks need black role models, and so on, the more we send the message that children should seek only role models of their own race and sex. And, as I've argued above, that message is actually harmful to those children who belong to a race or sex that -- often through no fault of its own -- simply does not contain role models (in the particular fields in which the children are interested) who are as great as those that have been produced by another race or sex. An excessive and highly publicized focus on race- and sex-specific role modeling is thus, I suspect, harmful to the very groups (women and nonwhites) that it's trying to help.
I agree that people ought to look broadly within the whole of humanity for their role models. As a philosopher, I would have no role models at all if I confined myself to my own sex, that Russian Jewish woman philosopher notwithstanding. To find role models in the history of philosophy, I must look beyond the superficial similarities of race, sex, and class to the more fundamental issues of method, style, and ideas. And I'm far better off for doing so, as I can pick and choose from among the best, e.g. Aristotle, Locke, Mill, rather than from a small (and frankly mediocre) subset.
From the outside, I certainly have little in common with a misogynistic, slave-holding Greek who lived over 2000 years ago, a.k.a. Aristotle. And, despite her sex, I have little in common with a Russian Jewish immigrant fascinated with Hollywood, a.k.a. Ayn Rand. Friendship would likely have been impossible with either of these philosophers. But the whole point of philosophy (as well as other endeavors like art, science, and so on) is to transcend those cultural divides and personal preferences, to find something universal to all humanity. So to look for role models based upon superficial characteristics is to radically misunderstand (in good postmodernist fashion) the whole point of these subjects.
One final note: I could be, I suppose, a very good woman philosopher. If that were my goal, then women philosopher role models might be appropriate. But to think in such terms is limiting, patronizing, and deeply sexist. I want to be a very good philosopher, period. (I wonder if other women in philosophy think in those terms, however. At CU Boulder, about a third of the grad students in philosophy are women -- and most of them are focused on feminist issues, not real philosophy. That's disappointing, but not surprising.)
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
Tuesday, May 13, 2003
Silly Joke from Who Knows Who By Diana Hsieh @ 11:27 AM
In pharmacology, all drugs have two names, a trade name and generic name: Tylenol is acetaminophen, Aleve is naproxen, Amoxil is amoxicillin, Advil is ibuprofen, and so on. The FDA has been looking for a generic name for Viagra, and announced that it has settle on mycoxafloppin. Also considered were mycoxafailin, mydixadrupin, mydixarizin, mydixadud, dixafix, and of course, ibepokin.
E-mail Diana HsiehPermaLinkComments (Popup)
BloggerThis
Sunday, May 11, 2003
Principles of Healthy Eating By Diana Hsieh @ 10:43 PM
As a general principle of cannibalism, this one by Jonah Goldberg seems pretty sensible to me: "And while I'm not kosher myself, I do think I would prefer to eat only kosher people." Sometimes being pro-Judiasm can go a bit too far, I must admit...
It's Tin, It's From France! By Diana Hsieh @ 10:19 PM
I just turned in my final paper for the semester. Thank goodness! It has been a very unpleasant week of endless hours of writing, take-out dinners, the occasional panic, and Vivarin. Yes, Vivarin. I've never had to take drugs to stay awake before, but I was sleep deprived for just too many days on end to stay awake all by willpower alone. Now I wish marijuana were legal.
So now I just have my Camp Indecon lessons to finish up (due May 15th), my Advanced Seminar paper on philosophy of mind to overhaul (due May 26th), a massive programming project (due June 15th), and my Objectivism 101 lectures to revise (due June 24th). Then I'll be gone from home for a month for the TOC summer seminar, the ARI summer conference, and Camp Indecon. I'm taking August off... oh, except I'll have a paper on self-deception to due at the end of the month.
Gnat said this today: "First there's the woman. Then there's fire. Then bonking bonking bonking." Does the stress and sleep deprivation explain why I found it so completely hysterical? I don't know. All I know is that IT'S TIN, IT'S FROM FRANCE. Really.
American Idol was perfect tonight. Life is good... or at least better.